by BPJ Leeuwenburgh 2024 Cited by 27patients were treated with amiodarone as compared to lidocaine (22.8% vs. Intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous amiodarone. (in a new aqueous
Lidocaine vs Amiodarone for PALS? There was no difference in any clinical outcome in pediatric patients with shockable rhythm with lidocaine
between those receiving lidocaine vs. placebo (ARR 2.6% 95% CI -1.0 to 6.3%) or between those receiving amiodarone vs. lidocaine (ARR 0.7%, 95% CI -3.2 to.
Mike Winters Amal Mattu at Resuscitation: Amio vs Lidocaine vs Placebo in Cardiac Arrest; Anton Helman at EM Cases: Journal Jam 7 Amiodarone vs Lidocaine vs Placebo in Cardiac Arrest: The ALPS Trial; Ken Milne at The SGEM: SGEM162: Not Stayin Alive More Often with Amiodarone or Lidocaine in OHCA
Only one study included children as participants. Three categories were identified: amiodarone vs. placebo, amiodarone vs. lidocaine, and amiodarone vs. nifekalant and were grouped as amiodarone vs. alternative treatment in order to derive more reliably the effect size of amiodarone towards cardiac arrest in the current meta-analysis.
In the Amiodarone vs. Lidocaine in Prehospital Ventricular Fibrillation Evaluation (ALIVE) trial, patients were randomized to receive either 1.5 milligrams of lidocaine or 5 milligrams per
Outcome by-stander witnessed arrest: 27.7% (amiodarone) vs 27.8% (lidocaine) vs 22.7% (placebo) absolute risk difference: EMS witnessed
by F Sanfilippo 2024 Cited by 52included 290 (lidocaine vs no lidocaine),25 180 (amiodarone vs no amiodarone) patients (amiodarone vs lidocaine).15. Only the latter study was
Amiodarone vs. Lidocaine for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation Synopsis: The use of amiodarone results in a better outcome than use of lidocaine in
in the pain. I wish I could afford laser dentistry.