96% Diltiazem vs. 46% Metoprolol (NNT=2) At every 5-minute interval, the diltiazem group was more likely to be rate controlled to a HR 100bpm
diltiazem vs metoprolol for acute AF. However, patients with diltiazem had higher incidence of worsening CHF symptoms defined as increased
(RVR). The patient is very symptomatic, and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response treated with IV diltiazem vs metoprolol.
Diltiazem vs Metoprolol for Afib w/ RVR? via @EMSwami FOAMed.
Diltiazem vs. Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation: 4 Differences to Know Written By Amy B. Gragnolati, PharmD, BCPS Published on Carvedilol or Metoprolol: Which Is the Better Beta Blocker?
Popular stories this week. Atrial fibrillation: doctor listening to heart beat . Diltiazem vs. Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation: 4 Differences to
In our study, 24 patients were randomized to the diltiazem group and 28 were randomized to the metoprolol group. Target rate control was achieved by 30 min in 95.8% of the diltiazem patients vs. only 46.4% for metoprolol. Fifty percent of the diltiazem group achieved target HR within the first 5 min, vs. only 10.7% in the metoprolol group.
Amiodarone versus diltiazem for rate control in critically ill patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias. Diltiazem vs. Metoprolol in the
Certain statins: The statins simvastatin and lovastatin interact with amlodipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. vs. Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation: 4
then vs than
accept vs expect
alright vs all right
its vs it's
there vs their
waist vs waste
your vs you're, you are